<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expansion? The Big Ten Dozen&#8217;t need it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wischlist.com/2010/03/expansion-the-big-ten-dozent-need-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wischlist.com/2010/03/expansion-the-big-ten-dozent-need-it/</link>
	<description>Chronicling Chicago (and other stuff) since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 02:54:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://wischlist.com/2010/03/expansion-the-big-ten-dozent-need-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4190</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wischlist.com/?p=533#comment-4190</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not against expansion if the team is truly worthwhile, but I&#039;m not in favor of expanding just for the sake of reaching an even number. The school has to be worth it. 

I haven&#039;t seen anyone mention Texas A&amp;M as coming along with Texas to the Big Ten. I&#039;d probably be surprised to see that, but who knows. That means, though, that the league would  have to find yet another school to reach 14. And at that point, you&#039;re starting to get Big East-unwieldy with the number of teams. 

I don&#039;t want to see what the Big Ten is and means watered down, and if there is expansion, I&#039;d want to see one worthwhile school (I don&#039;t think there are three worthwhile ones, in terms of athletics and academics) or nothing at all.

And, really, I&#039;m perfectly fine with nothing at all. If I had to guess, I&#039;d wager that the league ends up standing pat. But we&#039;ll see ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not against expansion if the team is truly worthwhile, but I&#8217;m not in favor of expanding just for the sake of reaching an even number. The school has to be worth it. </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen anyone mention Texas A&#038;M as coming along with Texas to the Big Ten. I&#8217;d probably be surprised to see that, but who knows. That means, though, that the league would  have to find yet another school to reach 14. And at that point, you&#8217;re starting to get Big East-unwieldy with the number of teams. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to see what the Big Ten is and means watered down, and if there is expansion, I&#8217;d want to see one worthwhile school (I don&#8217;t think there are three worthwhile ones, in terms of athletics and academics) or nothing at all.</p>
<p>And, really, I&#8217;m perfectly fine with nothing at all. If I had to guess, I&#8217;d wager that the league ends up standing pat. But we&#8217;ll see &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallon Christensen</title>
		<link>http://wischlist.com/2010/03/expansion-the-big-ten-dozent-need-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4189</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallon Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wischlist.com/?p=533#comment-4189</guid>
		<description>Dave, I don&#039;t think we&#039;d have to worry about Texas having &quot;ties&quot; to the Big 12.  Because of politics, Texas A&amp;M will come with Texas should Texas decide to join the Big 10.  That just leaves Oklahoma, and they can play that game as a non-conference game anyway.  The game will eventually move from the Cotton Bowl to Cowboys Stadium, so the current link to the Texas State Fair will be a non-issue.

I think there are enough reasons for Texas to make the jump, and they are not all athletic.  If I&#039;m the president of UT, I am looking at the academic partnerships with schools of the Big Ten.  Simply put, the Big Ten has better schools than the Big 12.

I don&#039;t necessarily agree with you about adding another team.  The ratings and money from a football conference championship game are enough to add the 12th team, as well as eliminating the bad practice of one team always having a bye during the conference season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;d have to worry about Texas having &#8220;ties&#8221; to the Big 12.  Because of politics, Texas A&amp;M will come with Texas should Texas decide to join the Big 10.  That just leaves Oklahoma, and they can play that game as a non-conference game anyway.  The game will eventually move from the Cotton Bowl to Cowboys Stadium, so the current link to the Texas State Fair will be a non-issue.</p>
<p>I think there are enough reasons for Texas to make the jump, and they are not all athletic.  If I&#8217;m the president of UT, I am looking at the academic partnerships with schools of the Big Ten.  Simply put, the Big Ten has better schools than the Big 12.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with you about adding another team.  The ratings and money from a football conference championship game are enough to add the 12th team, as well as eliminating the bad practice of one team always having a bye during the conference season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

